In re April R.
Filed
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
In re APRIL R., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. | |
MARIPOSA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ROBIN R., Defendant and Appellant. | F050215 (Super. Ct. No. 2023) OPINION |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Mariposa County. Wayne R. Parrish, Judge.
Stephanie J. Dolan, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Allen, Proietti & Fagalde and Michael A. Fagalde for Plaintiff and Respondent.
-ooOoo-
Appellant Robin R. contends (1) the juvenile court failed to comply with the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), 25 United States Code section 1901 et seq.; (2) the Welfare and Institutions Code section 300[1] petition failed to state a cause of action; (3) the evidence was insufficient to sustain the jurisdictional findings; and (4) the dispositional order denying reunification services and limiting visitation constitutes an abuse of discretion.
We will remand for the limited purpose of effecting valid notice of the pendency of the proceedings to the Cherokee tribes. The responses from the tribes, after receipt of valid notification, shall determine whether the orders of the juvenile court are affirmed or vacated.
FACTUAL
On
Robin did not admit to causing the injuries to April but offered numerous reasons for April's bruising, asserting that April slipped and fell on wet leaves, slipped while getting out of the bathtub, fell down the stairs, and similar explanations. Eventually, in April 2005, April was returned to Robin's custody and family reunification services were offered.
Between April 2005 and September 2005, the Department monitored Robin's progress on the case plan and April's condition. In October 2005, the juvenile court determined that it no longer needed to retain jurisdiction over April and the dependency was dismissed.
On
On
The petition was later amended to allege that April also came within the provisions of section 300, subdivisions (c) and (e).
On