In re Brandon B.
Filed 7/21/06 In re Brandon B. CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Placer)
----
| In re BRANDON B. et al., Persons Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. | |
| PLACER COUNTY HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ROSEMARY B. et al., Defendants and Appellants. |
C051367
(Super. Ct. Nos. 53-001063, 53-001064)
|
Rosemary B. (mother) and Christopher B. (father), parents of the minors Allyson and Brandon (the minors) and their older brother Adam (collectively, the children), appeal from an order of the juvenile court terminating their parental rights. (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 366.26, 395.)[1] Only Allyson and Brandon are the subject of this appeal. Mother contends the court erred by finding that the beneficial relationship and sibling exceptions to the termination of her parental rights did not apply. Father contends the court erred by finding that it was likely the minors would be adopted and that the beneficial relationship exception to the termination of his parental rights did not apply. He also claims that the court's â€
