legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Brandy M.

In re Brandy M.
02:21:2007

In re Brandy M


In re Brandy M.


Filed 2/20/07  In re Brandy M. CA2/7


 


 


 


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS


California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b).  This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT


DIVISION SEVEN
















In re BRANDY M. et al., Persons Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.


      B190298



LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES,


            Plaintiff and Respondent,


            v.


BRIAN B. and MANDY M.,


            Defendants and Appellants.



      (Los Angeles County


      Super. Ct. No. CK42419)


In re CONNOR M., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.


      B191774



LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES,


            Plaintiff and Respondent,


            v.


BRIAN B.,


            Defendant and Appellant.



      (Los Angeles County


      Super. Ct. No. CK42419)


            APPEALS from orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County.  Jacqueline Lewis, Temporary Judge.  (Pursuant to Cal. Const., art. VI, § 21.)  Affirmed.


            Christopher Blake, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant Brian B.


            Sharon S. Rollo, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant Mandy M.


            Raymond G. Fortner, Jr., County Counsel, Larry Cory, Assistant County Counsel, and Kim Nemoy, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.


____________________________


SUMMARY


            In one appeal (No. B190298), Brian B. and Mandy M. appeal from an order of the dependency court terminating their parental rights as to Brandy M. and Nathan B.  In a second appeal (No. B191774), Brian also appeals from the dependency court's order denying him DNA testing as to Connor M.[1]  We affirm both orders.


FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SYNOPSIS


Prior Writ Proceedings and Appeals


            In September 2004, in connection with a prior appeal regarding Brandy and Nathan (No. B174274), this court denied a writ petition challenging a dependency court order setting a selection and implementation hearing at the dispositional stage of the proceedings on the basis of the following facts (as summarized in No. B174727): 


            â€





Description In one appeal (No. B190298), Brian B. and Mandy M. appeal from an order of the dependency court terminating their parental rights as to Brandy M. and Nathan B. In a second appeal (No. B191774), Brian also appeals from the dependency court's order denying him DNA testing as to Connor M. Court affirm both orders.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale