In re Breonna S
Filed 2/10/06 In re Breonna S. CA4/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
| In re BREONNA S. et al., Persons Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. | |
| SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN'S SERVICES, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. L.S. et al., Defendants and Appellants. | E038926 (Super.Ct.Nos. J186294, J186295) OPINION |
APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Deborah A. Daniel, Temporary Judge. (Pursuant to Cal. Const., art. VI, § 21.) Affirmed.
Diana W. Prince, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant L.S.
Karen J. Dodd, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant Q.J.
Ronald D. Reitz, County Counsel, Danielle E. Wuchenich, and Julie J. Surber Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Stephen S. Buckley, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Minors.
L.S. (the father) and Q.J. (the mother) appeal from an order terminating their parental rights to their daughter, Breonna S. In addition, the mother appeals from an order terminating parental rights to J.P., her son by a different father. Both parents contend that the juvenile court and the Department of Children's Services (the Department) failed to inquire concerning the children's Indian heritage, as required for purposes of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) (25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.). The mother also contends that the juvenile court erred by finding that the â€
