legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Briana R.

In re Briana R.
09:08:2006

In re Briana R.





Filed 9/7/06 In re Briana R. CA6





NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS





California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT














In re BRIANA R., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.



H029520


(Santa Clara County


Super. Ct. No. JD14076)



SANTA CLARA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES,


Plaintiff and Respondent,


v.


ARMANDO R.,


Defendant and Appellant.




Armando R. appeals from an order of the juvenile court terminating his parental rights to his daughter Briana R. (born 1997) and selecting adoption as the permanent plan. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26.)[1] He challenges the evidence supporting the juvenile court's finding that Briana likely would be adopted and rejection of his evidence and argument that the case came with the exceptions to termination described by sections 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(A) (no termination if termination would be detrimental to the child because the parents maintained regular visitation and the child could benefit from continuing the relationship), and 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(E) (no termination if there would be substantial interference with a sibling relationship). We affirm the order.


legal background


Section 366.26 sets forth the procedure for permanently terminating parental rights concerning a child who has been removed from parental custody and declared a dependent child of the juvenile court. The statute states that the court shall terminate parental rights if it â€





Description Appellant appeals from an order of the juvenile court terminating his parental rights to his daughter and selecting adoption as the permanent plan. Appellant challenges the evidence supporting the juvenile court's finding that Briana likely would be adopted and rejection of this evidence and argument that the case came with the exceptions to termination described by sections 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(A), and no termination if there would be substantial interference with a sibling relationship. Court affirm the order.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale