legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Bryan A.

In re Bryan A.
09:07:2007



In re Bryan A.



Filed 5/14/07 In re Bryan A. CA2/5



NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS



California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.



IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION FIVE



In re BRYAN A., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.



B194362



(Los Angeles County



Super. Ct. No. YJ28746)



THE PEOPLE,



Plaintiff and Respondent,



v.



BRYAN A.,



Defendant and Appellant.



APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Wayne Denton, Temporary Judge. (Pursuant to Cal. Const., art. VI, 21.) Dismissed.



Torres & Torres, Steven A. Torres, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.



No appearance on behalf of Plaintiff and Respondent.



___________________________





The minor, Bryan A., appeals after he admitted that he possessed a controlled substance. (Health & Saf. Code,  11377, subd. (a).) The minor committed the offense on February 26, 2006, when he was 16 years of age. On September 19, 2006, the juvenile court ordered entry of judgment deferred pending completion of the terms and conditions of probation pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code[1]section 790. On October 12, 2006, the minor filed a notice of appeal from the juvenile courts September 19, 2006 order. We appointed counsel to represent the minor. Appointed appellate counsel filed an opening brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441. (See Smith v. Robbins (2000) 528 U.S. 259, 277-284.)



We requested the parties to brief the issue of whether the appeal must be dismissed because it is governed by section 800, subdivision (a) which provides in part, A judgment in a proceeding under Section 601 or 602 may be appealed from, by the minor, in the same manner as any final judgment, and any subsequent order may be appealed from, by the minor, as from an order after judgment. A deferred entry of judgment order pursuant to section 790 is not an appealable judgment or order. (In re Mario C. (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 1303, 1307-1308; see also Ricki J. v. Superior Court (2005) 128 Cal.App.4th 783, 790.)



The appeal is dismissed.



NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS



TURNER, P. J.



We concur:



MOSK, J.



KRIEGLER, J.



Publication Courtesy of San Diego County Legal Resource Directory.



Analysis and review provided by El Cajon Property line attorney.







[1] All further statutory references are to the Welfare and Institutions Code unless otherwise indicated.





Description The minor, Bryan A., appeals after he admitted that he possessed a controlled substance. (Health & Saf. Code, 11377, subd. (a).) The minor committed the offense on February 26, 2006, when he was 16 years of age. On September 19, 2006, the juvenile court ordered entry of judgment deferred pending completion of the terms and conditions of probation pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 790. On October 12, 2006, the minor filed a notice of appeal from the juvenile courts September 19, 2006 order. Court appointed counsel to represent the minor. Appointed appellate counsel filed an opening brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441. (See Smith v. Robbins (2000) 528 U.S. 259, 277-284.) The appeal is dismissed.


Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale