legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Camilo P.

In re Camilo P.
05:31:2006

In re Camilo P.




Filed 5/16/06 In re Camilo P. CA6



NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS





California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.




IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT










In re CAMILO P., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.


H029142


(Santa Cruz County


Super. Ct. No. J20063)



THE PEOPLE,


Plaintiff and Respondent,


v.


CAMILO P.,


Defendant and Appellant.



Following a contested jurisdictional hearing, Camilo P., a minor, was continued as a ward of the court on probation. On appeal, the minor contends that his attorney was ineffective in failing to bring a motion to challenge the in court identifications of the minor, based on unduly suggestive pretrial identification procedures.


Statement of the Facts and Case


On March 29, 2005, about 6:00 p.m., Jose C. was walking down Winchester Boulevard in Campbell with his friends, Andrea S., Claudia V. and Amada C. A black Camaro pulled over and the minor and another male got out of the car. The minor approached Jose and said to him, â€





Description A decision regarding a minor, was continued as a ward of the court on probation .
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale