In re Deshon R.
Filed 7/18/06 In re Deshon R. CA2/7
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SEVEN
| In re DESHON R., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. | B186907 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. JJ13146) |
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DESHON R., Defendant and Appellant. |
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County.
Charles R. Scarlett, Judge. Affirmed as modified.
Patricia Winters, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Assistant Attorney General, Margaret E. Maxwell and Lance E. Winters, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
__________________________
Thirteen-year-old Deshon R. (the minor) was declared a ward of the juvenile court and placed home on probation after the court found he had committed second degree robbery as alleged in two petitions.[1] With respect to the second petition, the court also found a principal was armed in the commission of the robbery.[2] The minor contends one of his probation conditions is unconstitutional and the court failed to exercise its discretion when setting his maximum period of confinement. We affirm the order as modified.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Among the conditions of his probation, the minor was ordered to maintain satisfactory grades and school attendance, to participate in a counseling program, to not knowingly associate with anyone disapproved of by his parents or probation officer, and in condition 16, to â€
