In re D.S.
Filed 10/19/06 In re D.S. CA1/4
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FOUR
| In re D. S., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. | |
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. D. S., Defendant and Appellant. | A114459 (San Francisco County Super. Ct. No. JW 06-6412) |
D. S. appeals from an order declaring him a ward of the juvenile court and placing him on probation on condition that he successfully complete the Log Cabin Ranch School program.[1] His counsel has asked this court for an independent review of the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436). After review of the record, we find no error and affirm.
A juvenile petition filed pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 alleged that the minor committed attempted second degree robbery (Pen. Code, §§ 212.5, subd. (c), 664),[2] two counts of assault with a deadly weapon (§ 245, subd. (a)(1)), second degree robbery (§ 212.5, subd. (c)), and battery with serious bodily injury (§ 243, subd. (d)). Pursuant to a negotiated disposition, the minor admitted two counts of violations of section 245, subd. (a)(1) and one count of a violation of section 487, subd. (c). The count initially alleged robbery and then amended to allege grand theft.[3] At the dispositional hearing, the juvenile court made the minor a ward of the court, found that returning the minor to his parents would be detrimental, and ordered that he be placed on probation and complete the Log Cabin Ranch School program. This timely appeal followed.
The minor was represented by counsel at all times during the proceedings. He was advised of his constitutional rights and the consequences of his admissions prior to the entry of his admissions. Minor’s counsel stipulated to a factual basis for, and consented to, the admissions. No error appears in the entry of minor’s admissions, or in the disposition proceedings. There are no meritorious issues to be argued on appeal.
The judgment is affirmed.
_________________________
Sepulveda, J.
We concur:
_________________________
Reardon, Acting P.J.
_________________________
Rivera, J.
Publication Courtesy of California free legal resources.
Analysis and review provided by Spring Valley Property line Lawyers.
[1] Additional conditions of probation were also imposed.
[2] All further section references are to the Penal Code.
[3] According to the dispositional report, the allegations in the petition arose from two incidents, committed on the same day, wherein the minor and his companions attempted to rob two victims (and were successful as to one victim), using a plastic gun. The robbery victim was struck several times in the head with the plastic gun, and suffered a laceration to his head and bleeding from his inner ear.
