In re Elizabeth C.
Filed 4/25/06 In re Elizabeth C. CA2/3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
| In re Elizabeth C. et al., Persons Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. | B184759 |
| LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. TERESA M., Defendant and Appellant. | (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. CK47879) |
Appeal from orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Stephen Marpet, Referee. Affirmed.
M. Elizabeth Handy, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Raymond G. Fortner, Jr., County Counsel, Larry Cory, Assistant County Counsel, and Jerry M. Curtis, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Continue from Part I……..
CONTENTIONS
Teresa contends the trial court erred in summarily denying her section 388 petition and in refusing to provide a ten-day continuance of the section 366.26 hearing.
DISCUSSION
1. The trial court did not err in denying Teresa's section 388 petition without holding a hearing.
Pursuant to section 388, a parent may petition the court to set aside, change or modify a previous order. â€
