legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Emily W.

In re Emily W.
06:13:2006

In re Emily W.






Filed 5/31/06 In re Emily W. CA3



NOT TO BE PUBLISHED







California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.








IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA




THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT




(Shasta)


----












In re EMILY W., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.




SHASTA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES,


Plaintiff and Respondent,


v.


MELISSA M.,


Defendant and Appellant.




C051064



(Super. Ct. No. 2530601)




Melissa M. (appellant), the mother of Emily W. (the minor), appeals following the six-month review hearing in the minor's dependency proceedings. (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 366.21, subd. (e), 395; unspecified section references that follow are to the Welfare and Institutions Code.) Appellant contends there was insufficient evidence to support the juvenile court's decision to continue the minor's out-of-home placement. We disagree and affirm the judgment.


Facts and Proceedings


On June 10, 2004, three days after the minor's birth, the Shasta County Department of Social Services (DSS) filed a dependency petition alleging the minor came within section 300, subdivisions (b) and (j). Regarding subdivision (b), the petition alleged â€





Description A decision regarding dependency proceedings.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale