legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Freddy P.

In re Freddy P.
02:28:2007

In re Freddy P


In re Freddy P.


Filed 2/7/07  In re Freddy P. CA2/7


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS


 


California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b).  This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT


DIVISION SEVEN










In re FREDDY P., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.


      B189714


      (Los Angeles County


      Super. Ct. No. JJ11480)


THE PEOPLE,


            Plaintiff and Respondent,


            v.


FREDDY P.,


            Defendant and Appellant.



            APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County.


Robert S. Ambrose, Temporary Judge.  (Pursuant to Cal. Const., art. VI, § 21.)  Affirmed, and remanded with directions.


            Debbie M. Page, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.


            Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Mary Jo Graves, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Assistant Attorney General, Lawrence M. Daniels and Yun K. Lee, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.


______________________________


            Freddy P. appeals from the order of continuing wardship after the juvenile court found he had possessed a concealable firearm.  The only issue on appeal is whether the juvenile court erred in failing to declare on the record whether the offense was a misdemeanor or a felony.  We remand for the juvenile court to determine whether the firearm possession offense is a misdemeanor or a felony. 


FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND


            On the night of January 13, 2006, Freddy P. was detained by two deputy sheriffs after they saw him remove a handgun from his waistband and throw it onto the roof of a nearby house.  Freddy P. was arrested after the handgun was recovered from the roof and found to be loaded and operable.


            In a petition filed pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 602, it was alleged then 17-year-old Freddy P. committed â€





Description Appellant appeals from the order of continuing wardship after the juvenile court found he had possessed a concealable firearm. The only issue on appeal is whether the juvenile court erred in failing to declare on the record whether the offense was a misdemeanor or a felony. Court remand for the juvenile court to determine whether the firearm possession offense is a misdemeanor or a felony.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale