legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re G.M. CA2/6

abundy's Membership Status

Registration Date: Jun 01, 2017
Usergroup: Administrator
Listings Submitted: 0 listings
Total Comments: 0 (0 per day)
Last seen: 06:01:2017 - 11:31:27

Biographical Information

Contact Information

Submission History

Most recent listings:
In re K.P. CA6
P. v. Price CA6
P. v. Alvarez CA6
P. v. Shaw CA6
Marriage of Lejerskar CA4/3

Find all listings submitted by abundy
In re G.M. CA2/6
By
02:16:2018

Filed 1/3/18 In re G.M. CA2/6
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX


In re G.M., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.
2d Juv. B283349
(Super. Ct. No. J070971)
(Ventura County)

VENTURA COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

M.M.,

Defendant and Appellant.


M.M. (Father) appeals an order terminating parental rights to his daughter, G. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26.) In case No. B282603, he appeals an order terminating parental rights to his son, B. B. is G.’s half brother and they are placed together with their prospective adoptive parents.
In our separate opinion in case No. B282603, we conclude that notice under the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA, 25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.) as to B. was defective but cured and that ICWA does not apply to B.
Here Father contends that if B. is an Indian child, his joint placement with G. may be jeopardized, and the juvenile court should consider whether the sibling relationship exception applies. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(v).) Our decision in case No. B282603 that ICWA does not apply to B. renders these contentions moot.
DISPOSITION
The order is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.


TANGEMAN, J.
We concur:



YEGAN, Acting P. J.



PERREN, J.

Tari L. Cody, Judge

Superior Court County of Ventura

______________________________


John L. Dodd, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

Leroy Smith, County Counsel, Alison L. Harris, Assistant County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.





Description M.M. (Father) appeals an order terminating parental rights to his daughter, G. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26.) In case No. B282603, he appeals an order terminating parental rights to his son, B. B. is G.’s half brother and they are placed together with their prospective adoptive parents.
In our separate opinion in case No. B282603, we conclude that notice under the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA, 25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.) as to B. was defective but cured and that ICWA does not apply to B.
Here Father contends that if B. is an Indian child, his joint placement with G. may be jeopardized, and the juvenile court should consider whether the sibling relationship exception applies. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(v).) Our decision in case No. B282603 that ICWA does not apply to B. renders these contentions moot.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.
Views 6 views. Averaging 6 views per day.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale