In re Heather H.
Filed 5/15/06 In re Heather H. CA2/7
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SEVEN
In re HEATHER H., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. | B184960 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. PJ35271) |
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. HEATHER H., Defendant and Appellant. |
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County,
Morton Rochman, Judge. Affirmed and remanded with directions.
Ronnie Duberstein, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Apppellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Assistant Attorney General, Susan D. Martynec and Robert S. Henry, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
____________________________
The juvenile court sustained a petition alleging Heather H. (the minor) had committed aggravated assault by hitting the victim in the head with a bottle.[1] Without declaring her to be a ward of the court, the juvenile court placed the minor on probation for six months pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 725, subdivision (a). On appeal, the minor challenges two of her probation conditions.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The clerk's and reporter's transcripts are in conflict regarding two conditions of probation. As contained in the July 14, 2005 minute order, condition 15 reads: â€
