legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re I.L. CA2/6

mk's Membership Status

Registration Date: May 18, 2017
Usergroup: Administrator
Listings Submitted: 0 listings
Total Comments: 0 (0 per day)
Last seen: 05:23:2018 - 13:04:09

Biographical Information

Contact Information

Submission History

Most recent listings:
P. v. Mendieta CA4/1
Asselin-Normand v. America Best Value Inn CA3
In re C.B. CA3
P. v. Bamford CA3
P. v. Jones CA3

Find all listings submitted by mk
In re I.L. CA2/6
By
05:22:2018

Filed 5/21/18 In re I.L. CA2/6
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX


In re I.L., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.
2d Juv. No. B283224
(Super. Ct. No. TJ22651)
(Los Angeles County)

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

I.L.,

Defendant and Appellant.


I.L., a minor, appeals from an order adjudicating him a ward of the court under Welfare and Institutions Code section 602.
I.L. and another individual approached A.W. while he was walking alone. One of the two individuals pushed A.W., and the other one punched A.W. in the face. One of the individuals grabbed A.W.’s phone, and the two of them ran away. During an interview with an officer, A.W. identified I.L. as one of the individuals. I.L. admitted to another officer that he punched A.W.
At the adjudication hearing, the juvenile court found true the allegation that I.L. committed second degree robbery (Pen. Code, § 211). The court declared I.J. a ward of the court, and placed him home on probation with terms and conditions.
We appointed counsel to represent I.L. in this appeal. After counsel’s examination of the record, she filed an opening brief raising no issues. On March 1, 2018, we advised I.L. that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues that he wished to raise on appeal. We have not received a response.
We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that I.L.’s attorney has fully complied with her responsibilities and that no arguable issue exists. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)
The order is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.


TANGEMAN, J.
We concur:



GILBERT, P. J.



PERREN, J.

Donna Groman, Judge

Superior Court County of Los Angeles

______________________________

Nadezhda Habinek, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.






Description I.L., a minor, appeals from an order adjudicating him a ward of the court under Welfare and Institutions Code section 602.
I.L. and another individual approached A.W. while he was walking alone. One of the two individuals pushed A.W., and the other one punched A.W. in the face. One of the individuals grabbed A.W.’s phone, and the two of them ran away. During an interview with an officer, A.W. identified I.L. as one of the
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.
Views 5 views. Averaging 5 views per day.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale