In re Iris O.
Filed 7/31/06 In re Iris O. CA
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
| In re IRIS O., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. | B187239 |
| LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. INDIRA Z., Defendant and Appellant. | (Super. Ct. No. CK 55930) |
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Valerie L. Skeba, Juvenile Court Referee. Affirmed.
________
Deborah Dentler, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Raymond G. Fortner, Jr., County Counsel, Larry Cory, Assistant County Counsel, and Lisa Proft, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
_________
Following a 12-month dependency review hearing (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.21, subd. (f)),[1] the dependency court terminated dependency jurisdiction over the child, Iris O., and issued an order, often referred to as a family law â€
