In re Jonathan M.
Filed 8/10/07 In re Jonathan M. CA2/5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FIVE
In re JONATHAN N., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. | B195921 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. NJ21707) |
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JONATHAN N., Defendant and Appellant. |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, John Ing, Temporary Judge. (Pursuant to Cal. Const., art. VI, 21.) Affirmed.
Niccol Kording, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
_______________________________________
Appellant Jonathan N. appeals from the order declaring him a ward of the juvenile court pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 602. The juvenile court sustained a petition alleging that Jonathan N. committed two counts of assault with a deadly weapon (Pen. Code, 245, subd. (a)(1)), two counts of assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury (Pen. Code, 245, subd. (a)(1)), and vandalism (Pen. Code, 594, subd. (a)). Jonathan N. was ordered into the camp community placement program for a period of three months. His maximum period of confinement was fixed at five years.
Counsel was appointed to represent Jonathan N. on appeal. On June 29, 2007, counsel filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, requesting this court to conduct an independent review of the record for arguable issues. By letter dated July 6, 2007, this court notified Jonathan N. of his right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days. No supplemental brief has been received.
This court has conducted an independent review of the record. There are no arguable appellate issues. The judgment is therefore affirmed. (Smith v. Robbins (2000) 528 U.S. 259; People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d at p. 443.)
KRIEGLER, J.
We concur:
TURNER, P. J.
MOSK, J.
Publication Courtesy of California attorney referral.
Analysis and review provided by Vista Property line attorney.
