legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Jordan W.

In re Jordan W.
03:02:2007

In re Jordan W


In re Jordan W.


Filed 2/9/07  In re Jordan W. CA3


 


 


 


 


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED


 


California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b).  This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.


 


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT


(Butte)


----










In re JORDAN W., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.


THE PEOPLE,


          Plaintiff and Respondent,


     v.


JORDAN W.,


          Defendant and Appellant.



C051437


(Super. Ct. No. J29788)



     The juvenile court sustained charges of two counts of arson[1] and one count of making a false police report against Jordan W., a minor.  The minor was committed to the California Youth Authority.[2]  


     On appeal, the minor contends the evidence is insufficient to support the juvenile court's finding that he committed the arson charged in count 1 of the petition.  Disagreeing, we shall affirm.


FACTS RELATING TO ARSON OF THE LUMBER BUILDING


     The lumber building is one of four buildings owned by Diamond Match on a 136-acre site in Chico.  The building was two stories tall, the size of a football field, made of wood and timber, over 100 years old, and had a basement with a dirt floor.  No utilities were connected to the building.  Although the Diamond Match property was enclosed by a six foot tall chain link fence, teenagers would frequently sneak into the building, break things, and leave graffiti spray cans and beer bottles. 


     During the night of November 19/20, 2004, the minor, Tabitha and Courtney entered the lumber building to â€





Description The juvenile court sustained charges of two counts of arson and one count of making a false police report against Jordan W., a minor. The minor was committed to the California Youth Authority.
On appeal, the minor contends the evidence is insufficient to support the juvenile court's finding that he committed the arson charged in count 1 of the petition. Disagreeing, Court affirm.

Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale