legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Juan A.

In re Juan A.
02:12:2007

In re Juan A


In re Juan A.


Filed 1/12/07  In re Juan A. CA5


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS


 


California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b).  This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT










In re JUAN A., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.


THE PEOPLE,


Plaintiff and Respondent,


                        v.


JUAN A.,


Defendant and Appellant.



F050246


(Super. Ct. No. JJD059783)


OPINION


THE COURT*


            APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County.  Hugo J. Loza, Temporary Judge.  (Pursuant to Cal. Const., art. VI, § 21.)


            Nannette J. Stomberg, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.


            Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Mary Jo Graves, Chief Assistant Attorney General, and Charles A. French, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.


-ooOoo-


            In July 2005, a juvenile wardship petition (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 602) was filed, alleging appellant Juan A., a minor, committed vandalism causing damage of less than $400 (Pen. Code, § 594, subds. (a) & (b)(2)(A)), a misdemeanor.  In March 2006, following the jurisdiction hearing, the juvenile court found the allegation true.  In April 2006, following the disposition hearing, the court adjudged appellant a ward of the court and placed him on probation.


Appellant's appointed appellate counsel has filed an opening brief which summarizes the pertinent facts, with citations to the record, raises no issues, and asks that this court independently review the record.  (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.)  Appellant has not responded to this court's invitation to submit additional briefing.


At the jurisdiction hearing, Virginia Acevedo testified to the following.  She was at home on March 3, 2005, when appellant and several other minors broke windows in her house.  Appellant, using a bottle, broke two windows. 


Evelyn L., age 17, testified that she was outside her house (which, according to the testimony of a police officer, was approximately 75 yards from Acevedo's house) when she saw â€





Description In July 2005, a juvenile wardship petition (Welf. & Inst. Code, S 602) was filed, alleging appellant, a minor, committed vandalism causing damage of less than $400 (Pen. Code, S 594, subds. (a) & (b)(2)(A)), a misdemeanor. In March 2006, following the jurisdiction hearing, the juvenile court found the allegation true. In April 2006, following the disposition hearing, the court adjudged appellant a ward of the court and placed him on probation.
Appellant's appointed appellate counsel has filed an opening brief which summarizes the pertinent facts, with citations to the record, raises no issues, and asks that this court independently review the record. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Appellant has not responded to this court's invitation to submit additional briefing.
Following independent review of the record, court have concluded that no reasonably arguable legal or factual issues exist.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale