In re Juan C
Filed 5/15/06 In re Juan C. CA2/7
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SEVEN
In re JUAN C., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. | B187107 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. YJ26325) |
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JUAN C., Defendant and Appellant. |
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County,
Stephanie Davis, Judge. Affirmed.
Murray A. Rosenberg, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Assistant Attorney General, Ana R. Duarte and Thomas C. Hsieh, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
_________________________
Juan C. appeals from an order of wardship entered after the juvenile court found him in violation of his probation and lifted his previously deferred entry of judgment. He contends the evidence is insufficient he violated a condition of his probation. We affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In February 2005, then 14-year-old Juan C. (the minor) admitted he had unlawfully driven or taken a vehicle (count 1) and had driven without a license (count 3) [1] as alleged in a December 2004 Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 petition.[2] The juvenile court granted deferred entry of judgment,[3] found count 1 to be a felony, and calculated the maximum term of confinement as three years two months. The court ordered the minor home on probation with specified conditions, including condition 9, requiring the minor to attend a school program approved by the probation officer and to maintain satisfactory grades, attendance, and citizenship. The juvenile court explained to the minor if he complied with the probation conditions, the case would be dismissed; if not, the court would revoke the deferred entry of judgment and proceed to disposition or sentencing. The court also repeatedly told the minor he had to attend school daily, to refrain from any â€
