legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Kayla G.

In re Kayla G.
02:21:2007

In re Kayla G


In re Kayla G.


Filed 1/17/07  In re Kayla G. CA2/5


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS


 


California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b).  This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT


DIVISION FIVE










In re KAYLA G., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.


      B191976


      (Los Angeles County


      Super. Ct. No. CK50898)



LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES,


            Plaintiff and Respondent,


            v.


GABRIELLE D.,


            Defendant and Appellant.



            APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Valerie Skeba, Temporary Judge.  (Pursuant to Cal. Const., art. VI, § 21.)  Affirmed.


            Christopher Blake, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.


            Raymond G. Fortner, Jr., Los Angeles County Counsel, Larry Cory, Assistant County Counsel, and Judith A. Luby, Senior Deputy County Counsel.



I.                                      introduction


            The mother, Gabrielle D., appeals from a juvenile court order pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code[1] section 366.26 terminating the parental rights to the child, Kayla D. (who was born in June 2004).  The mother's sole contention on appeal is the juvenile court erred in failing to apply the sibling relationship exception of section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(E).  Because the parental rights termination order is supported by substantial evidence, we affirm. 


II.                                Background


            On January 3, 2005, the Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services (â€





Description The mother, appeals from a juvenile court order pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 terminating the parental rights to the child, (who was born in June 2004). The mother's sole contention on appeal is the juvenile court erred in failing to apply the sibling relationship exception of section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(E). Because the parental rights termination order is supported by substantial evidence, court affirm.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale