In re Kobe G
In re Kobe G
02:10:2006
In re Kobe G
Filed 2/3/06 In re Kobe G. CA2/8
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION EIGHT
In re KOBE G. et al., Persons Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.
B183575
(Los Angeles County
Super. Ct. No. CK 50378)
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
REGINALD G. et al.,
Defendants and Appellants.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Margaret S. Henry, Judge. Affirmed
Anna L. Ollinger, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant Reginald G.
Andre F. F. Toscano, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant Jennifer B.
Raymond G. Fortner, Jr., County Counsel, Larry Cory, Assistant County Counsel, and Pamela S. Landeros, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
* * * * * *
This is the third time that the matter of Kobe G. and Maya G. is before us. In Jennifer B. v. Superior Court, No. B174470, filed on August 31, 2004, we denied the petition for a writ of mandate filed by the children's mother in which she sought to reverse the trial court's finding that there was a substantial risk of harm if the children were returned to her custody. In In re Kobe G., No. B173915, filed on March 30, 2005, we conditionally affirmed the trial court's order denying the father's petition for modification under Welfare and Institutions Code section 388, and remanded the case with directions to comply with rule 1439 of the California Rules of Court, which implements the Indian Child Welfare Act (25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.).
On June 7, 2005, the trial court ordered parental rights terminated and freed Kobe and Maya for adoption. Jennifer and Reginald appeal from these orders. We affirm.
THE ISSUE ON APPEAL
The trial court's order terminating parental rights and freeing the children for adoption was entered under subdivision (b)(1) of Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26, referred to hereafter as section 366.26. In relevant part, subdivision (c)(1) of section 366.26 provides that when, as here, the court has continued to remove the child from the custody of the parent and has terminated reunification services, these circumstances â€
02:10:2006
Filed 2/3/06 In re Kobe G. CA2/8
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION EIGHT
In re KOBE G. et al., Persons Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.
B183575
(Los Angeles County
Super. Ct. No. CK 50378)
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
REGINALD G. et al.,
Defendants and Appellants.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Margaret S. Henry, Judge. Affirmed
Anna L. Ollinger, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant Reginald G.
Andre F. F. Toscano, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant Jennifer B.
Raymond G. Fortner, Jr., County Counsel, Larry Cory, Assistant County Counsel, and Pamela S. Landeros, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
* * * * * *
This is the third time that the matter of Kobe G. and Maya G. is before us. In Jennifer B. v. Superior Court, No. B174470, filed on August 31, 2004, we denied the petition for a writ of mandate filed by the children's mother in which she sought to reverse the trial court's finding that there was a substantial risk of harm if the children were returned to her custody. In In re Kobe G., No. B173915, filed on March 30, 2005, we conditionally affirmed the trial court's order denying the father's petition for modification under Welfare and Institutions Code section 388, and remanded the case with directions to comply with rule 1439 of the California Rules of Court, which implements the Indian Child Welfare Act (25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.).
On June 7, 2005, the trial court ordered parental rights terminated and freed Kobe and Maya for adoption. Jennifer and Reginald appeal from these orders. We affirm.
THE ISSUE ON APPEAL
The trial court's order terminating parental rights and freeing the children for adoption was entered under subdivision (b)(1) of Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26, referred to hereafter as section 366.26. In relevant part, subdivision (c)(1) of section 366.26 provides that when, as here, the court has continued to remove the child from the custody of the parent and has terminated reunification services, these circumstances â€
| Description | A decision on writ of mandate. |
| Rating |
