In re Lee B.
Filed 2/13/07 In re Lee B. CA2/8
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION EIGHT
In re LEE B., A Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. | B185079 |
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. LEE B., Defendant and Appellant. | (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. VJ27403) |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Charles Clay, III, Judge. Reversed.
Holly Jackson, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Mary Jo Graves, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Linda C. Johnson and Carl N. Henry, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
_______________________
SUMMARY
Appellant challenges the decision of the juvenile court sustaining a Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 petition against him on the ground the trial court considered a dismissed charge in reaching its disposition. We agree and remand for a new disposition hearing.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On December 23, 2004, a Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 petition (â€
