legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Lee H.

In re Lee H.
07:14:2006

In re Lee H.


Filed 7/13/06 In re Lee H. CA1/5


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS





California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.





IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION FIVE













In re LEE H., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.





THE PEOPLE,


Plaintiff and Respondent,


v.


LEE H.,


Defendant and Appellant.




A111193



(Contra Costa County


Super. Ct. No. J0100237)




Lee H. (minor) contends the juvenile court abused its discretion in committing him to the California Youth Authority (CYA). We disagree and affirm.


FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY


Minor was born in November 1986.


Minor's involvement with the juvenile justice system began in 2000, with several arrests for truancy. In 2001, minor was made a ward of the court on charges of misdemeanor burglary, two counts of auto theft (one felony, one misdemeanor), misdemeanor weapon possession and misdemeanor marijuana possession.[1] He was committed to a local youth rehabilitation center (OAYRF) for six months. In regard to his stay at the center, we quote from the probation report: â€





Description A decision as to committing a minor to the California Youth Authority on the ground of Minor's involvement misdemeanor burglary, auto theft and misdemeanor marijuana possession.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale