Fear Not Law Articles: In re Luis H

In re Luis H

In re Luis H

Filed 3/9/11 In re Luis H. CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

In re Luis H., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.
TULARE COUNTY HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ERIC H., Defendant and Appellant.	F060611 (Super. Ct. No. JJV063532) OPINION

THE COURT^*
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County. Charlotte Wittig, Commissioner.
Beth Melvin, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Kathleen Bales-Lange, County Counsel, and Carol E. Helding, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
-ooOoo-

Eric H. (father) appeals from an order terminating parental rights (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26) to his son Luis H.^{^[1]} Father joins in an argument made by the child's mother in her appeal, In re Luis H. (case no. F060612). The mother argued the juvenile court erred by not finding termination would be detrimental to the child based on the parent-child relationship they shared. On review, we concluded the juvenile court did not abuse its discretion by rejecting the mother's argument. Because father in this appeal raises no independent claim of error, we conclude the court properly terminated his parental rights.
DISPOSITION
The order terminating parental rights is affirmed.

Publication Courtesy of San Diego County Legal Resource Directory.
Analysis and review provided by El Cajon Property line Lawyers.
San Diego Case Information provided by www.fearnotlaw.com

^* Before Hill, P.J., Detjen, J. and Franson, J.

^{^[1]} All statutory references are to the Welfare and Institutions Code unless otherwise indicated.

Description	Eric H. (father) appeals from an order terminating parental rights (Welf. & Inst. Code, Â§ 366.26) to his son Luis H.[1] Father joins in an argument made by the child's mother in her appeal, In re Luis H. (case no. F060612). The mother argued the juvenile court erred by not finding termination would be detrimental to the child based on the parent-child relationship they shared. On review, we concluded the juvenile court did not abuse its discretion by rejecting the mother's argument. Because father in this appeal raises no independent claim of error, we conclude the court properly terminated his parental rights.
Rating	0/5 1 2 3 4 5 0/5 based on 0 votes.