In re Marco T.
Filed 6/19/06 In re Marco T. CA5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
| In re MARCO T., a Person Coming Under The Juvenile Court Law. |
|
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MARCO T., Defendant and Appellant. |
F048501
(Super. Ct. No. JW089333-02)
O P I N I O N |
THE COURT*
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County. H.A. Staley, Judge.
Rachel Lederman, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Mary Jo Graves, Assistant Attorney General, Louis M. Vasquez and Leslie W. Westmoreland, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
-ooOoo-
Appellant Marco T., a minor, admitted allegations that he committed assault with a deadly weapon (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(1)) and violated probation granted in a previous wardship proceeding. Following the subsequent disposition hearing, the court ordered appellant committed to the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Juvenile Justice (DCRJJ), formerly known as the California Youth Authority (CYA). The court declared a maximum period of physical confinement (MPPC) of four years. However, a document that is apparently part of the disposition hearing minute order, entitled â€
