legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Marcus G.

In re Marcus G.
02:21:2007

In re Marcus G


In re Marcus G.


Filed 2/20/07  In re Marcus G. CA2/7


 


 


 


 


 


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS


California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b).  This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT


DIVISION SEVEN










In re MARCUS G., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.


      B191978


      (Los Angeles County


      Super. Ct. No. CK 08654)


LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES,


            Plaintiff and Respondent,


            v.


JULIA G.,


            Defendant and Appellant.



            APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County.  Stanley  Genser, Temporary Judge.  (Pursuant to Cal. Const., art. VI, § 21.)  Affirmed.


            Anna L. Ollinger, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.


            Raymond G. Fortner, Jr., County Counsel, Larry Cory, Assistant County Counsel, and O. Raquel Ramirez, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.


_______________________________


            Julia, the mother of minor Marcus, appealed from the order terminating her parental rights.  Marcus lived with his maternal grandparents[1] who were his legal guardians and wanted to adopt him.  Julia contends there was insufficient evidence to support that order as the adoption home study was not complete and the marital status of the prospective adoptive parents was not documented.  We affirm.


FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SYNOPSIS


I.  Detention and Jurisdiction/Disposition


            Marcus came to the attention of respondent Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services (â€





Description The mother of minor, appealed from the order terminating her parental rights. Minor lived with his maternal grandparents who were his legal guardians and wanted to adopt him. Mother contends there was insufficient evidence to support that order as the adoption home study was not complete and the marital status of the prospective adoptive parents was not documented. Court affirm.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale