In re Marriage of RALPH
Filed 8/15/06
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
| In re Marriage of RALPH and KATHLEEN BALCOF. | |
| RALPH BALCOF, Respondent, v. KATHLEEN BALCOF, Appellant. | G035868 (Super. Ct. No. 00D001015) O P I N I O N |
Appeal from a judgment and an order of the Superior Court of Orange County, Gary P. Ryan, Judge. (Retired judge of the Orange Super. Ct. assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to art. VI, § 6 of the Cal. Const.) Affirmed.
Law Offices of Jeffrey W. Doeringer and Jeffrey W. Doeringer for Appellant.
Honey Kessler Amado for Respondent.
* * *
In a prior appeal,[1] Kathleen Balcof challenged a judgment holding that a writing she and her husband, Ralph Balcof, signed during marriage did not constitute a transmutation of certain of his property interests to those of hers.[2] We held that the writing satisfied the requirements for a transmutation of Ralph's interest in the marital residence and 20 percent of the stock in his separate property corporation. However, we observed that Ralph had been precluded from presenting evidence to the effect that he was under duress when he signed the writing. Consequently, we reversed and remanded the matter to give him an opportunity to present his evidence and to make his arguments concerning the enforceability of the otherwise valid transmutation. On remand, the trial court held that the transmutation document was unenforceable due to both duress and undue influence.
Kathleen appeals, challenging the judgment on a plethora of grounds. We hold that the trial court did not exceed the scope of this court's instructions on remand, and furthermore, that retrial was not precluded either because of a â€
