In re M.F.
Filed 10/18/06 In re M.F. CA4/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
| In re M.F., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. | |
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. M.F., Defendant and Appellant. | E039819 (Super.Ct.No. J188319) OPINION |
APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Margaret A. Powers, Judge. Affirmed.
Howard J. Stechel, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Minor admitted violations in three separate Welfare and Institutions Code[1] section 602 petitions, violations of Penal Code section 422, terrorist threats. Minor was allowed to remain in the family home under terms of probation but later left home without permission. Minor admitted leaving home without permission and was ordered placed in a residential facility. Minor left that residential treatment facility in Campbell, California, and after admitting the section 777 violation, he was placed in another facility in Bakersfield. Minor left that facility after a short time and subsequently admitted yet another section 777 violation and was placed in a third residential treatment facility, this time in Hesperia. Subsequently, minor was removed from that placement after he failed to follow the directions of the staff at the Hesperia placement, admitted the violation under section 777, and was placed in another residential treatment facility in Lakeside. At that facility, minor was found to be in possession of cocaine and charged in a petition in San Diego County Juvenile Court with violation Health and Safety Code section 11350, possession of cocaine. Following the admission, the matter was transferred back to San Bernardino County Juvenile Court for disposition.
Minor was placed in yet another residential treatment facility, this time in Long Beach. Shortly thereafter, the minor left that placement and subsequently admitted the violation under section 777. Minor was placed in another residential treatment facility in Van Nuys. Minor left that facility without permission and admitted the allegation in the subsequent section 777 petition. Minor was placed in another treatment facility in Victorville but was removed after he broke the rules and regulations of his placement, including making sexual remarks to an adult neighbor and refusing redirection. Minor admitted the allegations in a subsequent petition under section 777.
Minor was referred for diagnostic evaluation at the California Youth Authority under section 704, subdivision (a). The subsequent report to the court recommended minor be committed to the California Youth Authority. After a contested dispositional hearing, the court followed the recommendation.
Minor appealed, and upon his request, this court appointed counsel to represent him. Counsel has filed a brief under authority of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3rd 436, and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, setting forth a statement of the case, a summary of the facts, and requesting this court undertake a review of the entire record.
We have invited minor to file a supplemental brief, which he has not done.
We have completed our independent review of the record and find no arguable issues.
The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS.
HOLLENHORST
Acting P. J.
We concur:
RICHLI
J.
KING
J.
Publication courtesy of San Diego free legal advice.
Analysis and review provided by Santee Property line Lawyers.
[1] All further statutory references are to the Welfare and Institutions Code unless otherwise indicated.
