Filed 9/18/18 In re M.H. CA5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
| In re M.H., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. |
|
|
MADERA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
VALERIE B.,
Defendant and Appellant.
|
F077425
(Super. Ct. No. MJP017689)
OPINION |
THE COURT*
APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of Madera County. Thomas L. Bender, Judge.
Jessica M. Ronco, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Office of County Counsel, Miranda P. Neal and Derek Walzberg, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
-ooOoo-
Mother Valerie B. appeals from the juvenile court’s orders finding M.H. adoptable and terminating her parental rights to him pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 on March 8, 2018. In mother’s related appeal in In re M.H., F076782, she contends the juvenile court abused its discretion in denying her section 388 petition to receive reunification services for M.H. In this appeal, mother contends that if we find error and reverse the juvenile court’s orders in the related appeal, we must also reverse this appeal, as well as vacate the juvenile court’s orders finding adoption as M.H.’s permanent plan and terminating mother’s parental rights.[1] (See In re A.L. (2010) 190 Cal.App.4th 75, 80.) Because we affirm the juvenile court’s orders in case No. F076782, and because mother has raised no other issue on appeal, we affirm the juvenile court’s orders.
DISPOSITION
The orders of the juvenile court finding M.H.’s permanent plan as adoption and terminating mother’s parental rights are affirmed.
