legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Randy M.

In re Randy M.
02:19:2006

Filed 12/22/05 In re Randy M

Filed 12/22/05 In re Randy M. CA4/2

 

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

 

California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.

 

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

 

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

 

DIVISION TWO

 

 

 

In re RANDY M., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

 

 

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN'S SERVICES,

 

Plaintiff and Respondent,

 

v.

 

BARBARA L.,

 

Defendant and Appellant.

 

 

 

E038868

 

(Super.Ct.No. J195468)

 

OPINION

 

 

APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Robert G. Fowler, Temporary Judge. (Pursuant to Cal. Const., art. VI, § 21.) Affirmed.

Rich Pfeiffer, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance by Plaintiff and Respondent.

Appellant Barbara L. (Mother) is the mother of the minor, Randy M. The San Bernardino Department of Children's Services (the Department) received a referral on June 5, 2004, from St. Mary's Regional Hospital in Apple Valley regarding the minor, a newborn. Nurses at the hospital had observed Mother treat her newborn son in a rough manner. She would slam the baby down in his crib and would not cradle his head. Concern for the baby's risk of brain damage due to this conduct motivated the hospital to inform the Department. Mother was uncooperative with both the social worker sent to interview her and the deputy sheriff called to assist in the interview. The father (Father), who was not married to Mother but living with her at the time of the birth of the minor, was also uncooperative and explosive in his reactions to both the social worker's and the deputy sheriff's inquiries about his son.[1] The child was placed in protective custody. Mother, when informed of this decision, reacted by stating, â€





Description Dependency decsion.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale