In re Raymond G.
Filed 7/12/06 In re Raymond G. CA1/1
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
| In re RAYMOND G., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. | |
| SAN FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RAYMOND G., Defendant and Appellant. | A111660 (San Francisco County Super. Ct. No. JD05-3184) |
Following a jurisdictional and dispositional hearing the juvenile court declared the minor, Raymond[1], a dependent child, and denied appellant reunification services. Appellant challenges the juvenile court's findings that he is not a presumed father of the minor and is not entitled to reunification services. We conclude that appellant did not establish his status as a presumed father of the minor, and affirm the judgment.
STATEMENT OF FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The minor was born in October 1989, and thereafter was the subject of numerous referrals and dependency proceedings before this action was initiated pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivisions (b) and (g), on July 7, 2005. The present petition alleged that the minor's mother Patricia was absent and failed to provide Raymond with authorized medical attention for a â€
