In re Ronel F
Filed 3/20/06 In re Ronel F. CA2/4
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FOUR
| In re RONEL F., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. | B180475 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. TJ14031) |
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RONEL F., Defendant and Appellant. |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court for Los Angeles County, Charles Q. Clay, III, Judge. Affirmed.
Holly Jackson, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Assistant Attorney General, Ana R. Duarte and Viet H. Nguyen, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Appellant Ronel F. appeals from a judgment declaring him a ward of the juvenile court under Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 after the court found to be true allegations that he committed a robbery for the benefit of a criminal street gang. (Pen. Code, §§ 211, 186.22, subd. (b)(1)(C).)[1] We affirm the judgment.
BACKGROUND
On October 17, 2004, Lorence G. was riding his bicycle down Florence Avenue when he encountered three individuals, two young men and a young woman. Both of the men were wearing identical orange University of Tennessee jackets with the letter â€
