In re Said R
Filed 5/31/06 In re Said R. CA4/3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
| In re SAID R., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. | |
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. SAID R., Defendant and Appellant. | G035743 (Super. Ct. No. DL018226) O P I N I O N |
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Michael Cassidy, Temporary Judge. (Pursuant to Cal. Const., art. VI, § 21.) Affirmed.
Norma A. Aguilar, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gary W. Schons, Assistant Attorney General, Pamela Ratner Sobeck and Christopher P. Beesley, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
* * *
The juvenile court found Said R., to be a person described by Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 because he resisted, delayed, or obstructed an officer in violation of Penal Code section 148, subdivision (a)(1). On appeal, Said contends the court erred by denying his Welfare and Institutions Code section 701.1 motion to dismiss the petition because substantial evidence does not supports the finding. We disagree and affirm the judgment.
FACTS
The only evidence in this case was testimony from Orange Police Officer Jorge Chavez on Said's motion to suppress. After the suppression motion was denied, counsel stipulated Chavez's testimony could be used in the trial and no further evidence was presented.
In the late afternoon on November 3, 2004, Chavez was on patrol in his marked police car at The Block of Orange, a large shopping center. He saw Said and another boy riding bicycles on the road circling the shopping center and parking lots. Neither boy was wearing a bike helmet (a violation of the Vehicle Code), and both were wearing gloves in an area where there had been numerous recent automobile burglaries. Chavez decided to stop the boys to find out what they were up to.
Chavez drove his patrol car up to the two boys and stopped. As he started to get out of the car, he said something like, â€
