In re Steven F.
Filed 6/5/06 In re Steven F. CA2/6
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SIX
| In re STEVEN F., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. | 2d Juv. No. B186630 (Super. Ct. No. J1053874) (Santa Barbara County) |
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. STEVEN F., Defendant and Appellant. |
Steven F. appeals from the judgment entered after his admission that he gave false information to a police officer in violation of Penal Code section 148.9 subdivision (a) as alleged in a subsequent petition under Welfare and Institutions Code section 602. The trial court committed appellant to the California Youth Authority for a maximum period of 5 years, 11 months.
We appointed counsel to represent him on this appeal. After examination of the record, counsel filed an opening brief in which no issues were raised.
On April 21, 2006, we advised appellant that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues which he wised us to consider. No response has been received to date.
We have examined the entire record and are satisfied that appellant's attorney has fully complied with her responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)
The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.
YEGAN, J.
We concur:
GILBERT, P.J.
COFFEE, J.
Thomas R. Adams, Judge
Superior Court County of Santa Barbara
______________________________
California Appellate Project, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Respondent.
Publication courtesy of San Diego pro bono legal advice.
Analysis and review provided by Poway Apartment Manager Lawyers.
