legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re the Marriage of BARBARA and WILLIAM C. SCHOPFER

In re the Marriage of BARBARA and WILLIAM C. SCHOPFER
08:24:2010



In re the Marriage of BARBARA and WILLIAM C




In re the Marriage of BARBARA and
WILLIAM C. SCHOPFER














Filed 7/7/10; opinion on rehearing











CERTIFIED
FOR PUBLICATION






IN THE COURT OF
APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE
DISTRICT

(Sacramento)

----




>










In re the Marriage of BARBARA
and WILLIAM C. SCHOPFER.







WILLIAM C. SCHOPFER,



Appellant,



v.



DANIEL BONEBRAKE,



Respondent.




C060549



(Super.
Ct. No. 96FL01642)




APPEAL
from a judgment of the Superior Court
of Sacramento
County, Jerilyn L. Borack, Judge. Affirmed.



Frank
E. Dougherty and Matthew K. Purcell for Appellant.



Law Office of Derraugh Manion
Dawson and Law Office of Kimball J.P. Sargeant and Kimball Sargeant for
Respondent.





Following the
death of his ex-wife, William C. Schopfer (father) shared custody of his
daughter, Jennifer, with her stepfather, Daniel C. Bonebrake (stepfather). Pursuant to a court order, father also paid
stepfather $900 each month in child support.
Four months before Jennifer was expected to graduate from high school,
however, and a month before she was to turn 18, father moved to reduce his
child support obligation to zero. The trial court denied his motion.

On appeal, father
contends the trial court erred in denying his request to modify support because
under subdivision (a) of Family Code section 3951[1]
and Plumas County Dept. of Child Support
Services v. Rodriquez
(2008) 161 Cal.App.4th 1021 (Rodriquez), â€




Description Following the death of his ex-wife, William C. Schopfer (father) shared custody of his daughter, Jennifer, with her stepfather, Daniel C. Bonebrake (stepfather). Pursuant to a court order, father also paid stepfather $900 each month in child support. Four months before Jennifer was expected to graduate from high school, however, and a month before she was to turn 18, father moved to reduce his child support obligation to zero. The trial court denied his motion.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale