In re Y.B.
Filed 4/21/06 In re Y.B. CA1/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
| In re Y. B., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. | |
| ALAMEDA COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES AGENCY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JASMINE A., Defendant and Appellant. | A110765 (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. J05001154) |
I. INTRODUCTION
Mother, Jasmine A., appeals from the juvenile court's jurisdictional order finding that her daughter, Y B., came within the provisions of Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivisions (b), (d) and (g).[1] She argues the order should be reversed because (1) substantial evidence does not support the court's jurisdictional findings under section 300, subdivisions (d) or (b)[2]; (2) the wrongful assertion of jurisdiction over Y is prejudicial to Mother; and (3) counsel was ineffective for failing to object to hearsay in the jurisdictional and dispositional report. None of these contentions has any merit. We affirm the order.
II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Two-year-old Y was detained on April 27, 2005. The Alameda County Social Services Agency (Agency) alleged that in April 2005, Mother groped and fondled Y in the vaginal area[3] and performed oral sex on her; mother was also observed groping and fondling her during a diaper change while saying, â€
