In reJessica M.
Filed 2/16/07 In re Jessica M. CA3
NOTTO BE PUBLISHED
CaliforniaRules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing orrelying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, exceptas specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified forpublication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OFAPPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATEDISTRICT
(Butte)
----
| In re JESSICA M. et al., Persons Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. |
|
|
BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL SERVICES,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
ANNETTE M.,
Defendant and Appellant.
|
C053415
(Super. Ct. Nos. J31304, J31305)
|
Appellant, the mother of the minors, appeals from thejuvenile court's order terminating her parental rights. (Welf. &Inst. Code, §§ 366.26, 395.)[1] Appellant claims the juvenile court's order must be vacated because the minorsdid not receive proper notice of the hearing and the juvenile court failed to ascertain whythe minors were not present at the hearing. We shall affirm.
Facts and Procedural History
Dependency petitions were filed in July 2004 concerningthe minors--Jessica (age eight) and Branden (age 10)--after appellant wasarrested for childendangerment. According to the petitions, appellant's â€
| Description | Appellant, the mother of the minors, appeals from the juvenile court's order terminating her parental rights. (Welf. and Inst. Code, SS 366.26, 395.) Appellant claims the juvenile court's order must be vacated because the minorsdid not receive proper notice of the hearing and the juvenile court failed to ascertain why the minors were not present at the hearing. Court affirm. |
| Rating |
