Jackson v. Darling
Filed 6/7/07 Jackson v. Darling CA2/5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FIVE
WILLIAM JACKSON, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ROSLYN DARLING, Defendant and Appellant. | B192121 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BS102905) ORDER MODIFYING OPINION; ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT] |
THE COURT:*
It is ordered that the opinion filed May 17, 2007, be modified as follows:
The fourth paragraph in the body of the opinion is deleted in its entirety and is modified to read as follows:
The same rules apply to Darling's next argument, that the order must be reversed because it is overly restrictive and too severe. We do not find the order overly restrictive or too severe. It is, rather, a standard order prohibiting the conduct the statute is designed to address. (Code Civ. Proc., 527.6.)
The petition for rehearing is denied.
There is no change in judgment.
__________________________________________________________________
* ARMSTRONG, J. TURNER, P. J. MOSK, J.
Publication courtesy of San Diego free legal advice.
Analysis and review provided by Santee Property line attorney.
