legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Janis v. Gary D. Hamilton, Inc.

Janis v. Gary D. Hamilton, Inc.
07:25:2006

Janis v. Gary D. Hamilton, Inc.




Filed 7/24/06 Janis v. Gary D. Hamilton, Inc. CA2/2





NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS


California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION TWO










CONRAD JANIS et al.


Plaintiffs and Appellants,


v.


GARY D. HAMILTON, INC., et al.


Defendants and Respondents.



B172623


(Los Angeles County


Super. Ct. No. SC073185)



APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County.


Joseph C. Kalin, Judge. Affirmed.


Law Offices of Richard P. Towne, Richard P. Towne; Watt, Tieder, Hoffar & Fitzgerald, David F. McPherson for Plaintiffs and Appellants.


Koletsky, Mancini, Feldman & Morrow, Andrew M. Morrow, Raymond C. Dion for Defendants and Respondents Gary D. Hamilton, Inc., and Gary D. Hamilton.


Murchison & Cumming, Michael J. Nu





Description Action for breach of warranty, conspiracy to fraudulently conceal defective work, dangerous conditions, declaratory relief against the general contractor and subcontractors who repaired and renovated the Appellants home.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale