legal news


Register | Forgot Password

JOHN S. WILLIAMS v. WILLIAM SNOW HUME

JOHN S. WILLIAMS v. WILLIAM SNOW HUME
07:05:2006

JOHN S. WILLIAMS v. WILLIAM SNOW HUME






Filed 6/29/06



CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION





IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA





FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT





DIVISION THREE














Conservatorship of the Person and Estate of LAURA SNOW AUSTON HUME.




JOHN S. WILLIAMS, as Public Guardian, etc.,


Petitioner and Respondent,


v.


WILLIAM SNOW HUME,


Objector and Appellant.



G036141


(Super. Ct. No. A219294)


O P I N I O N



Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Orange County, Gerald G. Johnston, Judge. Affirmed.


William Snow Hume, in pro. per., for Objector and Appellant.


Benjamin P. de Mayo, County Counsel, and James C. Harvey, Deputy County Counsel for Conservator and Respondent.


I


We publish this case to make explicit what is otherwise implicit in the statute dealing with objections to inventories and accountings in conservatorship proceedings (Prob. Code, § 2614[1]) -- namely that the burden of proof is on the objector to the inventory and accounting, not on the conservator.


The facts are simple: The Orange County Public Guardian was appointed


conservator of Laura Snow Auston Hume sometime prior to June 2004. In June 2004 the public guardian filed a final inventory and appraisal of Laura's estate. One of her children, William Snow Hume, filed objections.[2] A hearing was held, and the trial court entered an order overruling the objections and â€





Description Burden of proof for objections to inventories and accountings in conservatorship proceedings is on party objecting to appraisal and not on conservator.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale