Keegan & Coppin Co. v. Magee
Filed 6/1/06 Keegan & Coppin Co. v. Magee CA1/5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FIVE
| KEEGAN & COPPIN COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. KENNETH MAGEE et al., Defendant and Appellant. | A108653 (Sonoma County Super. Ct. No. SCV 233169) |
Defendant and appellant Kenneth Magee (Magee) appeals a summary judgment in favor of plaintiff and respondent Keegan & Coppin Company, Inc. (Keegan & Coppin), in the latter's action for breach of a real estate listing agreement. He contends the listing agreement was unenforceable and that the trial court erred in sustaining objections to his evidence.
BACKGROUND
On August 8, 2002, Keegan & Coppin, a real estate broker, through its agent, Annette Cooper, entered into an agreement with Magee, as â€
