Kim v. Shin

Filed 8/30/06 Kim v. Shin CA2/1

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

APPEALS from judgments of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Joseph R. Kalin, Judge. Dismissed.

Riley & Reiner, Raymond L. Riley and Douglas D. Winter for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Fulbright & Jaworski, Douglas W. Stern and Joseph H. Park for Defendants and Respondents Dong Ok Shin and Sun Hee Kim.

Loeb & Loeb, David C. Nelson and Adam F. Streisand for Defendant and Respondent City National Bank.

____________________

Plaintiff Hee P. Kim appealed from judgments of dismissal entered in favor of defendants Dong Ok Shin, Sun Hee Kim and City National Bank. Dong Ok Shin and Sun Hee Kim obtained a dismissal based on lack of personal jurisdiction following the granting of their motion to quash service of summons. City National Bank's dismissal followed the sustaining of its demurrer without leave to amend.

Prior to oral argument in the case, plaintiff notified us that the parties were pursuing settlement. We continued oral argument several times while they worked out a settlement. Eventually, plaintiff notified us that they had settled the case, and on August 8, 2006, plaintiff filed a request for dismissal of the appeal. In accordance with this request, we will dismiss the appeal.

The appeal is dismissed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

SPENCER, P. J.

We concur:

MALLANO, J.

ROTHSCHILD, J.

Publication Courtesy of San Diego County Legal Resource Directory.

Analysis and review provided by San Diego County Property line attorney.