Lee v. Sport Chalet
Filed 3/21/06 Lee v. Sport Chalet CA2/4
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FOUR
| YUL LEE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SPORT CHALET, Defendant and Respondent. | B182416 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. PC031406) |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Howard J. Schwab, Judge. Affirmed in part and Reversed in part.
James Alexander Kim for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Schaffer, Lax, McNaughton & Chen, Clifford L. Schaffer and Carol D. Toy for Defendant and Respondent.
Plaintiff Yul Lee appeals from the judgment entered on an order granting summary judgment in favor of defendant Sport Chalet. We affirm that portion of the judgment adjudicating plaintiff's negligence cause of action, but reverse that portion adjudicating plaintiff's products liability claim.
PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff's Complaint
Plaintiff filed a complaint against Sport Chalet alleging that on or about December 11, 2001, he purchased a Cannondale/Silk Trail 400 bicycle from Sport Chalet. According to plaintiff, the bicycle â€
