Littell v. Bridgestone Firestone North American Tire
Filed 8/28/06 Littell v. Bridgestone Firestone North American Tire CA4/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
| ROGER LITTELL et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. BRIDGESTONE FIRESTONE NORTH AMERICAN TIRE, LLC, Defendant and Respondent. | E037905 (Super.Ct.No. INC030708) O P I N I O N |
APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Christopher J. Sheldon, Judge. Affirmed.
Lisoni & Lisoni, Gail M. Lisoni and Joseph Louis Lisoni, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
Holland & Knight and Richard T. Williams for Defendant and Respondent.
Plaintiffs Roger Littell and Lou Ann Pleasant appeal the trial court's order denying their motion for class certification. We conclude that the trial court properly determined that common issues of fact and law would not predominate in the putative class action. Accordingly, we affirm the order.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs are the owners of vehicles which came factory equipped with â€
