LPP Mortgage v. Bizar
Filed 7/18/06 LPP Mortgage v. Bizar CA2/4
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FOUR
| LPP MORTGAGE, LTD., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. B. GORDON BIZAR et al., Defendants and Appellants. | B184907 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC278917) |
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Aurelio Munoz, Judge. Affirmed.
B. Gordon Bizar and Helene J. Bizar, in pro. per., for Defendants and Appellants.
Nossaman, Guthner, Knox & Elliott, Stephen P. Wiman and Scott N. Yamaguchi for Plaintiff and Respondent.
This is the second time we have addressed this matter. In our prior opinion, LPP Mortgage, Ltd. v. Bizar (2005) 126 Cal.App.4th 773, we affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff/respondent LPP Mortgage, Ltd. on an action for collection of a promissory note against defendants/appellants B. Gordon Bizar and Helene J. Bizar. Upon remand, respondents sought attorney fees and costs incurred during the appeal and were awarded a total of $80,988.34.
In this appeal, appellants challenge only the amount of costs awarded to respondent, a total of $5,883.54. They argue these costs are â€
