Marasovic v. Eberhard
02:19:2006
xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word"
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
Marasovic v. Eberhard
California
Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or
relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except
as specified by rule 977(b). This
opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for
purposes of rule 977.
IN
THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST
APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION
TWO
CAROLE v. LAURA | A106356 (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. C-826899) |
Appellant
Carole Marasovic seeks review of a summary
judgment entered in favor of respondent Laura Eberhard, a medical doctor
who is one of the defendants in an action arising out of the death of
appellant's mother. Appellant contends
that the judge who granted respondent's summary
judgment motion was biased against her; that her cause of action for
professional negligence should not have been summarily adjudicated because
respondent did not move for summary judgment on that cause of action; that the
court below erred in failing to consider evidence appellant submitted in
opposition to the summary judgment motion, and in finding no triable issue of
fact; and that the court should have permitted appellant to amend her complaint
to plead a cause of action on a negligence
per se theory based on asserted violations of state and local law.
affirm the judgment. name="_ftnref1" title="">
facts name="_ftnref2" title="">
and procedural background
In February
1999, appellant's mother, Elizabeth Marasovic, href="#_ftn3" name="_ftnref3" title="">
who was 83 years old, blind, and hard of hearing, was admitted overnight to
where she was diagnosed with a â€
| Description | A decision regarding grant of summary judgement motion. |
| Rating |
© 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory
Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.
