legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Marriage of Mercado and Meza

Marriage of Mercado and Meza
02:11:2007

Marriage of Mercado and Meza


Marriage of Mercado and Meza


Filed 1/18/07  Marriage of Mercado and Meza CA4/2


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS


 


California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b).  This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


 


FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT


 


DIVISION TWO










In re the Marriage of BLANCA MARGARITA MERCADO and RODOLFO GUSTAVO MEZA.


BLANCA MARGARITA MERCADO,


            Respondent,


v.


RODOLFO GUSTAVO MEZA,


            Respondent;


PAM IN HUR et al.,


            Appellants.



E039799


            (Super.Ct.No. IND081578)


            OPINION


            APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County.  Sarah Adams Christian, Judge.  Affirmed.


            Anderhold & Turner and James D. Turner for Appellants.


            Law Offices of Ronald T. Golan for Respondent Blanca Margarita Mercado.


            No appearance for Respondent Rodolfo Gustavo Meza.


            Appellants Pam In Hur and Beom Soo (Bob) Hur appeal from a judgment decreeing a resulting trust for the benefit of respondent Blanca Margarita Mercado and her former husband, Rodolfo Gustavo Meza, with respect to Mercado and Meza's marital home, and quieting title to the home in the name of Mercado.  They contend that there was insufficient evidence to support the court's finding of a resulting trust for the benefit of Meza and Mercado, that any such trust violated law and public policy, and that Mercado had â€





Description Appellants Pam In Hur and Beom Soo (Bob) Hur appeal from a judgment decreeing a resulting trust for the benefit of respondent Blanca Margarita Mercado and her former husband, Rodolfo Gustavo Meza, with respect to Mercado and Meza's marital home, and quieting title to the home in the name of Mercado. They contend that there was insufficient evidence to support the court's finding of a resulting trust for the benefit of Meza and Mercado, that any such trust violated law and public policy, and that Mercado had 'unclean hands.' Court affirm the judgment.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale