legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Marriage of Munir and Javed

Marriage of Munir and Javed
03:02:2007

Marriage of Munir and Javed


Marriage of Munir and Javed


Filed 2/22/07  Marriage of Munir and Javed CA6


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS


 


California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b).  This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.


 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT


In re THE MARRIAGE OF LUBNA MUNIR


AND MUNIR JAVED.


MUNIR JAVED,                                                                    H029538


                        Respondent,                                                   (Santa Clara County


                                                                                                 Superior Court


            v.                                                                                 No. 1-96-FL061854)


LUBNA MUNIR,


                        Appellant.


_____________________________________/


            The trial court refused to modify an existing child support order requiring appellant Lubna Rashid (formerly Lubna Munir) to pay $1,060 a month in child support, and the court required Rashid to make a payment of $52,420.94 to her former spouse respondent Munir Javed to equalize the court's division of the community's assets and liabilities.  Rashid challenges these orders on appeal.


            Rashid contests the court's refusal to modify the child support order on the ground that â€





Description The trial court refused to modify an existing child support order requiring appellant Lubna Rashid (formerly Lubna Munir) to pay $1,060 a month in child support, and the court required Rashid to make a payment of $52,420.94 to her former spouse respondent Munir Javed to equalize the court's division of the community's assets and liabilities. Rashid challenges these orders on appeal.
As Rashid has failed to demonstrate that the trial court's orders were in error, the trial court's orders affirmed.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale