legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Mc MULLEN v. HAYCOCK

Mc MULLEN v. HAYCOCK
02:22:2007

_


Mc MULLEN v. HAYCOCK


Filed 2/13/07


CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT


DIVISION FOUR







HUGH S. McMULLEN,


            Plaintiff and Respondent,


            v.


DON H. HAYCOCK,


            Defendant and Appellant.



      B187748


      (Los Angeles County
      Super. Ct. No. SC078914)



            APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los  Angeles County, Gerald Rosenberg, Judge.  Reversed and remanded.


            Don H. Haycock, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant.


            Timothy G. Dallinger for Plaintiff and Respondent.




            Under California law, assets held in private retirement plans are fully exempt from execution, both before and after distribution to the judgment debtor.  (Code Civ. Proc., §  704.115, subds. (b), (d).)[1]  Individual retirement accounts (IRA's), however, are exempt only to the extent â€





Description Where assets are rolled over from a retirement plan that is fully exempt from claims of creditors under Code of Civil Procedure Sec. 704.115 into an IRA, the full exemption -- rather than the limited exemption for IRA's under Sec.704.115 (e) applies.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale